lørdag, januar 23, 2021

Ikke for at vade i Muhammed

Daily Rush Debat Off-topic Ikke for at vade i Muhammed

  • Forfatter
    Emne
  • #0

    NorthBull
    Bruger
    4.038 indlæg
    Offline

    Men jeg læste lige noget pudsigt:

    EDIT*

    Pga efterspørgsel, hermed teksten på engelsk:

    The case flared up in February 2006
    – a ludicrous episode, which veered wildly between the extremes of comedy and tragedy.
    The previous September, the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten published twelve cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad. Over the next three months, indignation was carefully and systematically nurtured throughout the Islamic world by a small group of Muslims living in Denmark, led by two imams who had been granted sanctuary there.12 In late 2005 these malevolent exiles travelled from Denmark to Egypt bearing a dossier, which was copied and circulated from there to the whole Islamic world, including, importantly, Indonesia. The dossier contained falsehoods about alleged maltreatment of Muslims in Denmark, and the tendentious lie that Jyllands-Posten was a government-run newspaper. It also contained the twelve cartoons which, crucially, the imams had supplemented with three additional images whose origin was mysterious but which certainly had no connection with Denmark. Unlike the original twelve, these three add-ons were genuinely offensive – or would have been if they had, as the zealous propagandists alleged, depicted Muhammad. A particularly damaging one of these three was not a cartoon at all but a faxed photograph of a bearded man wearing a fake pig’s snout held on with elastic. It has subsequently turned out that this was an Associated Press photograph of a Frenchman entered for a pigsquealing contest at a country fair in France.13 The photograph had no connection whatsoever with the prophet Muhammad, no connection with Islam, and no connection with Denmark. But the Muslim activists, on their mischief-stirring hike to Cairo, implied all three connections .. . with predictable results.

    Kilde: Richard Dawkins – The God Delusion, s 31.

    Jeg var ikke klar over det blev fremprovokeret så meget. Jeg hader godt nok bare religion.

Viser 3 kommentarer - 76 til 78 (af 78 i alt)
  • Forfatter
    Kommentarer
  • #77

    ahymdahl5
    Tilskuer
    9.421 indlæg
    Offline

    #76 Jamen, jeg er enig med dig. Det var mig som misforstod.

    Og nej, du skal hverken anerkende eller acceptere.

    Men bare fordi du ser fodbold, er det ikke ensbetydende med at du er hooligan.

    Det jeg mente med at studere er, at der er grundlag for debat, på kryds og tværs.
    Jeg ved hvad ateisme og nihilisme er, men hvad kender du til religion, andet end hvad mediet siger?

    Un dos tres Maria!

    #78

    HQX
    Bruger
    1.218 indlæg
    Offline

    #77

    Hvis du mener om jeg har praktiseret det så er svaret nej. Men jeg har læst meget om religion, både bøger for religion og bøger imod religion.
    (og lad være med at sige at jeg ikke kan forstå det rigtigt fordi jeg ikke selv er troende, det er ligesom at sige at folk som er eksperter i anden verdenskrig ikke kan forstå det fordi de ikke selv var nazister under krigen

    #79

    ahymdahl5
    Tilskuer
    9.421 indlæg
    Offline

    #78 Jamen, så har du truffet et valg – baseret på de bøger, som du mener er det rene pladder. Respekt.=)

    Men er da enig med dig, misforstod første gang.:P

    Un dos tres Maria!

Viser 3 kommentarer - 76 til 78 (af 78 i alt)
  • Du skal være logget ind for at kommentere på dette indlæg.